Legal News for Credit Union Managers Since 1990
« Fatally Defective Mortgage Acceleration Notice
Garnishee Defendant Judgment: No Violation of Automatic Bankruptcy Stay »
07
Aug
2023

Preferential Transfers & Garnishment

Preferential Transfer: “Time” of Transfer adopted.

— On September 11th, a garnishment was filed on debtor’s savings account;

— On September 17th, a garnishment order to pay was issued by the court;

— On September 19th, garnishee defendant received the order to pay;

— On September 27th, funds were paid to the court by the garnishee defendant;

— On October 24th, funds were disbursed to the creditor;

Debtor filed bankruptcy on December 24th — more than 90 days after the garnishment was served but within 90 days after the garnished monies of more than $100,000 were received by the creditor.

The United States Code, 11 U.S.C. 547(b), provides that a transfer of funds is voidable as a preference if it is made within 90 days before the filing of the bankruptcy petition.

Issue: Did the garnishment payment to creditor qualify as a “preferential transfer” under the Bankruptcy Code which could be set aside and the creditor compelled to return the garnished assets to the bankruptcy trustee for distribution to all creditors?

The court held that the time of transfer is determined at the time of service of the garnishment and not when the funds are actually received by creditor.

This court also noted that the transfer time of the asset should be determined by applicable State law. In this case, Ohio statues provide that a garnishee defendant is liable to the judgment creditor “from the time the garnishee is served” with the written garnishment.

In conclusion, since the garnishment was served on the garnishee defendant more than 90 days prior to the debtor filing bankruptcy, this transfer was not considered a “preferential transfer” and would not be set aside. Hence, the creditor was entitled to retain the more than $100,000 obtained from the garnishment on debtor’s savings account. In re Battery One-Stop LTD., 155 B.R. 727.

EDITOR’S COMMENT

Different Bankruptcy Courts across the country have applied the applicable laws for their own State. Please seek the advice of your own attorney as to whether the garnishment transfer is considered to be “preferential” in your State.

Author: Charles R. Harroun



This entry was posted on Monday, August 7th, 2023 at 9:04 am and is filed under Bankruptcy, National. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

  • Recently Posted Articles written by: Charels R. Harroun, Attorney at Law

    • Credit Union Assessed Punitive Damages
    • Defective Notice to Sell Collateral Defeats Collection of Deficiency
    • Nondischargeable Debt: Disassembled Collateral
    • Credit Union Board-Member Suit Dismissed
    • Nondischargeable Gambling Debts
    • Credit Union Liable to Insurance Agent
    • Garnishment & Wage Assignment
    • Credit Union: Willful Violation of Automatic Stay
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Dismissed for Substantial Abuse
    • Credit Union Premises Liability
    • College Graduate Age Discrimination Suit

  • Website Builder

2009-2020 Copyright Harroun, P.C. | Credit Union Legal Newsletter powered by WordPress and Uchilla
Subscribe: Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)