Legal News for Credit Union Managers Since 1990
« Temporary Freeze on Member Deposits
Board Member Loses Suit Against Credit Union »
11
Jan
2023

Cram-Down Plan Amendment Denied

Debtors attempt to cram-down secured loan to “unsecured” status after debtor’s Chapter 13 Confirmation Hearing was denied by Court.

Here, debtor owed a loan to creditor secured by one Mercury automobile.

Debtor’s Chapter 13 repayment plan proposed to cram-down the obligation to the fair market value of the vehicle and repay creditor only $1,125, plus interest, and another ten percent that was scheduled for all unsecured creditors.

After debtor’s repayment plan was confirmed by the court, the vehicle’s engine began to emit excessive smoke, which would require repairs estimated at $1,500.

Debtor filed a motion with the bankruptcy court to modify the plan, surrender the collateral to creditor and treat any deficiency as an unsecured debt.

The court noted that a Chapter 13 plan may be modified after confirmation for limited purposes.

A plan may be modified under Title 11 U.S.C. Section 1329 to permit the debtor to:

(1) increase or decrease the amount of payments on claims of a particular class of creditors; (2) extend or reduce the time for such payments; or (3) to alter the amount of distribution to a creditor whose claim is provided for by the plan, to the extent necessary to take account of any payment of such claim made outside the plan.

The Bankruptcy Code does not provide that a debtor may modify the plan if the value of the collateral securing a debt is diminished after confirmation of the repayment plan.

This court held that once a repayment plan is confirmed to repay a secured creditor, debtor cannot later modify the plan and propose a lesser repayment to the secured creditor simply because the value of the collateral becomes diminished. In re Banks, 161 B.R. 375.

EDITOR’S COMMENT

The case above disallowing debtor to modify a confirmed Chapter 13 case could also be extended to prevent a debtor from post confirmation modification to decrease payment to a secured creditor where the collateral has been stolen or destroyed.

Author:  Charles R. Harroun, Attorney at Law



This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 11th, 2023 at 4:25 pm and is filed under Bankruptcy, National, Secured Loans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

  • Recently Posted Articles written by: Charels R. Harroun, Attorney at Law

    • Credit Union Assessed Punitive Damages
    • Defective Notice to Sell Collateral Defeats Collection of Deficiency
    • Nondischargeable Debt: Disassembled Collateral
    • Credit Union Board-Member Suit Dismissed
    • Nondischargeable Gambling Debts
    • Credit Union Liable to Insurance Agent
    • Garnishment & Wage Assignment
    • Credit Union: Willful Violation of Automatic Stay
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Dismissed for Substantial Abuse
    • Credit Union Premises Liability
    • College Graduate Age Discrimination Suit

  • Website Builder

2009-2020 Copyright Harroun, P.C. | Credit Union Legal Newsletter powered by WordPress and Uchilla
Subscribe: Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)