Legal News for Credit Union Managers Since 1990
« Cashier Checks: Bank Liable to Credit Union
Constructive Discharge: Credit Union Violates Employee’s Rights »
16
Jan
2023

Right to Cancel – Truth-In-Lending Violation

Defective Notice of Right to Cancel results in Truth in Lending Violation and extends borrowers right to rescind.

Here, New Maine National Bank granted a loan to the debtors secured by debtors’ residence.

At the closing of the loan, the loan officer supplied the debtors with a “Notice of Right to Cancel” (hereinafter “Notice”).

Pursuant to the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act (“the Act”), the debtors must be provided with a notice of the right to cancel the transaction with many loans secured by the borrowers’ residence.

In this case, the Notice was supplied to the borrowers, however, the Notice was defective insofar as it failed to advise the debtors of the date on which the borrowers’ statutory right to rescind would expire.

Approximately nine months after the loan was closed, the lender supplied another Notice to the debtors and, at that time, the debtors advised the lender that they were exercising the right to cancel.

The debtors had already received $175,619 from the bank.

The debtors also advised the bank that they were insolvent. Debtors subsequently filed for bankruptcy and demanded that the bank release its lien on their property.

The bank refused to release its lien and filed this action against the debtors seeking to enforce the lien. The Truth-In-Lending Act provides that if a borrower cancels the transaction, the debtors must return the funds received to the lender. The Maine statute, however, provides that:

If the creditor has delivered any property to the obligor, the obligor may retain possession of it.

The debtors sought to retain the money received from the bank and force the bank to discharge its lien.

Notwithstanding the Maine statute permitting the debtors to retain the funds, the Court held that equity may require that the funds be returned to the bank when the debtors exercise their right to cancel the transaction. Here, the Court ruled in favor of the bank. New Maine National Bank v. John Gendron (U.S. District Court, D. Maine, Case No. CIV-90-0181 P-C).

Author: Charles R. Harroun, Attorney at Law



This entry was posted on Monday, January 16th, 2023 at 4:32 pm and is filed under Mortgages, National, Truth In Lending. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

  • Recently Posted Articles written by: Charels R. Harroun, Attorney at Law

    • Credit Union Assessed Punitive Damages
    • Defective Notice to Sell Collateral Defeats Collection of Deficiency
    • Nondischargeable Debt: Disassembled Collateral
    • Credit Union Board-Member Suit Dismissed
    • Nondischargeable Gambling Debts
    • Credit Union Liable to Insurance Agent
    • Garnishment & Wage Assignment
    • Credit Union: Willful Violation of Automatic Stay
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Dismissed for Substantial Abuse
    • Credit Union Premises Liability
    • College Graduate Age Discrimination Suit

  • Website Builder

2009-2020 Copyright Harroun, P.C. | Credit Union Legal Newsletter powered by WordPress and Uchilla
Subscribe: Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)